0
RESEARCH PAPERS: Design Technology

A Comparison Between Trochoidal, Rotary Vane and Reciprocating Expanders

[+] Author and Article Information
F. J. Robinson

School of Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

J. Mech. Des 103(2), 304-309 (Apr 01, 1981) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3254908 History: Received March 01, 1980; Online November 17, 2009

Abstract

For the purpose of comparison, hypothetical designs for reciprocating and a rotary vane type expanders are considered in relation to a prototype trochoidal machine built and tested by the author. Geometrical and thermodynamic features of the three machines are discussed in addition to some of the practical problems associated with their configurations. Parameters such as chamber surface area to volume ratio and swept to bulk volume ratio have been evaluated for the designs considered and estimates are made for mechanical and diagram efficiencies likely to be achieved in each case. A new parameter is proposed whereby the instant turning moment at a given shaft angle may be determined as a function of chamber pressure and it is suggested that this parameter provides a convenient means for determining the optimum expansion ratio for various expander configurations.

Copyright © 1981 by ASME
Topics: Torque , Pressure , Machinery
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In