Research Papers

A Use of a Mathematical Model in Updating Concept Selection

[+] Author and Article Information
Shun Takai

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, 290C Toomey Hall, 400 West 13th Street, Rolla, MO 65409-0500takais@mst.edu

J. Mech. Des 132(10), 101009 (Oct 05, 2010) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4001974 History: Received September 20, 2009; Revised May 10, 2010; Published October 05, 2010; Online October 05, 2010

This paper presents the use of a mathematical model in updating a decision maker’s belief before selecting a product/system concept and demonstrates a procedure to calculate the maximum monetary value of such a model in terms of the expected value of information. Acquiring information about uncertainty and updating belief according to the new information is an important step in concept selection. However, obtaining additional information can be considered beneficial only if the acquisition cost is less than the benefit. In this paper, a mathematical model is used as an information source that predicts outcomes of an uncertainty. The prediction, however, is imperfect information because the model is constructed based on simplifying assumptions. Thus, the expected value of imperfect information needs to be calculated in order to evaluate the tradeoff between the accuracy and the cost of model prediction (information). The construction and analysis of a mathematical model, the calculation of the expected value of information (model prediction) and updating the belief based on the model prediction are illustrated using a concept selection for a public project.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Decision tree for the expected value of information calculation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Influence diagram for a public project

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Decision tree for a public project (without information)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Decision tree after decomposition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Belief updating: (a) initial probability tree and (b) flipped probability tree

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Likelihood P(“r=R”∣r=R)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Joint probability P(“r=R” and r=R)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Decision tree with and without information

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Expected value of information

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Updated concept selection

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Expected utility: (a) without information and (b) with information “r=95” of accuracy α=0.9

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Flipped joint probability P(r=R and “r=R”)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Preposterior P(r=R)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Posterior P(r=R∣“r”=R)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In