Research Papers

Using Support Vector Machines to Formalize the Valid Input Domain of Predictive Models in Systems Design Problems

[+] Author and Article Information
Richard J. Malak

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843rmalak@tamu.edu

Christiaan J. J. Paredis

G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332chris.paredis@me.gatech.edu

J. Mech. Des 132(10), 101001 (Sep 30, 2010) (14 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4002151 History: Received October 02, 2009; Revised July 01, 2010; Published September 30, 2010; Online September 30, 2010

Predictive modeling can be a valuable tool for systems designers, allowing them to capture and reuse knowledge from a set of observed data related to their system. An important challenge associated with predictive modeling is that of describing the domain over which model predictions are valid. This is necessary to avoid extrapolating beyond the original data, particularly when designers use predictive models in concert with optimizers or other computational routines that search a model’s input space automatically. The general problem of domain description is complicated by the characteristics of observational data sets, which can contain small numbers of samples, can have nonlinear associations among the variables, can be nonconvex, and can occur in disjoint clusters. Support vector machine (SVM) techniques, developed originally in the machine learning community, offer a solution to this problem. This paper is a description of a kernel-based SVM approach that yields a formal mathematical description of the valid input domain of a predictive model. The approach also provides for cluster analysis, which can lead to improved model accuracy through the decomposition of a data set into multiple subsets that designers can model independently. This paper includes a mathematical presentation of kernel-based SVM methods, an explanation of the procedure for applying the approach to predictive modeling problems, and illustrative examples for applying and using the approach in systems design.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

An illustration of the one-dimensional case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

An illustration of two independent variables with a valid domain that occupies less than the rectangular region defined by their upper and lower bounds

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Two convex hull domain descriptions. In (a), the convex hull envelops the data somewhat tightly. In (b), a large region without any data falls within the domain description.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

A synthetic data set with internal voids and distinct clusters

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

SVDD results for different settings of the Gaussian kernel width parameter, q. The regularization constant is held at C=0.4. Support vectors are indicated by boxes.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Cluster membership associations. Points A, B, and C are in the same cluster; point D is in a different cluster.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

SVC on the data set from Fig. 4 for two different settings of the kernel width parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

A visualization of the adjacency information corresponding to the graphs in Fig. 4. Two distinct clusters are evident in (a). In (b), six distinct clusters are evident, including two that contain only one point each.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

SVDD execution time on different synthetic data sets with varying data set sizes and kernel width parameter values

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Number of support vectors identified using SVDD on different synthetic data sets with varying data set sizes and kernel width parameter values

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Number of support vectors per data point in each synthetic data set

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Execution time of SVC for a synthetic data set with varying numbers of data points and kernel width parameter values

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Visualization of engine data domain. Small dots are not part of the valid domain.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Hydraulic log splitter: (a) physical layout, (b) functional configuration, where white boxes correspond to components associated with predictive models, and (c) circuit diagram




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In