0
Research Papers: Design Theory and Methodology

Design for Upgradability Algorithm: Configuring Durable Products for Competitive Reutilization

[+] Author and Article Information
Ke Xing

School of Advanced Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, University of South Australia, South Australia 5095, Australiake.xing@unisa.edu.au

Martin Belusko

Institute of Sustainable Systems and Technologies, University of South Australia, South Australia 5095, Australiamartin.belusko@unisa.edu.au

J. Mech. Des 130(11), 111102 (Oct 03, 2008) (14 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2976446 History: Received March 04, 2007; Revised July 24, 2008; Published October 03, 2008

Product upgrade, achieved through the improvement of the functionality of reused or remanufactured products, is often accepted as an effective way to attain a competitive reutilization. Design for upgradability (DFU) is a tool that primarily focuses on enhancing a product’s functional as well as physical fitness for ease of upgrade. This paper presents the development of a novel approach and its implementation algorithm for a systematic design of product upgradability. The framework of this approach consists of two major phases––modeling and optimization. Fuzzy logic is used as a tool to facilitate the modeling of a product’s upgradability based on its technical characteristics and the reutilization mode. In the optimization phase, a new DFU optimization program is developed by using genetic algorithm techniques. The objective of a product’s DFU optimization is defined so as to configure/redesign a product for the maximal level of upgradability with minimal associated costs and violations of engineering, economic, and environmental constraints. A case study on a solar heating system is presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed DFU algorithm and its effectiveness in generating optimal configurations for the system, which are reflected as significant improvements in the system’s upgradability, cost efficiency, and overall functionality.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Correspondence between DFU and GPD tasks in conceptual design

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

An example of matrix chromosome representation for a DFU solution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Case example: a solar heating system (33)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Constraints on component clustering and module formations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Chromosome representation of a DFU solution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Best chromosome and decoded solution for scenarios 3 and 4

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In