0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Improved Molecular Model of a Peptide Unit for Proteins

[+] Author and Article Information
Raghavendran Subramanian, Kazem Kazerounian

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269

J. Mech. Des 129(11), 1130-1136 (Nov 28, 2006) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2771230 History: Received June 20, 2006; Revised November 28, 2006

Pauling (1951, “The Structure of Proteins: Two Hydrogen-Bonded Helical Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain  ,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 37(4), pp. 205–211) in their seminal paper in 1951 reported numerical values for the bond lengths and bond angles for a peptide unit in proteins. These values became the standard model for several decades after that. In this paper, we have made an attempt to calibrate the values of these bond lengths and bond angles based on a systematic approach applied to a collection of proteins defined structurally in the protein data bank (PDB). Our method is based on the assumption that a peptide chain is a serial chain of identical rigid bodies connected by revolute joints (i.e., dihedral angles). Through an optimization process, the structural error (root mean square deviation of all atoms) between the resultant conformation and the PDB data is minimized to yield the best values for the bond length and bond angles in the calibrated peptide unit. Our numerical experiments indicate that by making small changes in the Pauling-Corey peptide model parameters (0.15–8.7%), the structural error is reduced significantly (3.0–57.4%). The optimum values for the bond angles and bond lengths are as follow; bond lengths: N–C(A): 1.4721Å, C(A)–C: 1.6167Å, C–N: 1.2047Å, CO: 1.1913Å and N–H: 0.9621Å. Bond bending angles: N–C(A)–C: 109.6823deg, C(A)CO: 119.518deg, C(A)–C–N: 114.5553deg, OCN: 125.9233deg, C–N–H: 123.5155deg, C–N–C(A): 121.5756deg, C(A)–N–H: 114.901deg peptide bond torsion angle: ω: 179.4432deg.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Zero-position notation of two consecutive peptide planes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Model of a peptide plane with standard dimensions reported by Pauling and Corey

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In