0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Integrating Target Costing Into Perception-Based Concept Evaluation of Complex and Large-Scale Systems Using Simultaneously Decomposed QFD

[+] Author and Article Information
Shun Takai1

Interdisciplinary Engineering Department, University of Missouri-Rolla, 101 Interdisciplinary Engineering Building, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409-0210takais@umr.edu

Kosuke Ishii

Mechanical Engineering Department, Design Division, Stanford University, Terman 501, Stanford, CA 94305-4021ishii@stanford.edu

1

Corresponding author.

J. Mech. Des 128(6), 1186-1195 (Jan 06, 2006) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2336256 History: Received September 22, 2004; Revised January 06, 2006

In the conceptual design phase, engineers may need to perceptually screen and prioritize feasible design concepts by their potential to fulfill both customer and financial requirements. This paper presents a system design methodology that integrates perception-based concept evaluation and target costing of complex and large-scale systems. The methodology decomposes a system into modules and evaluates each module concept with its target requirements and cost. This method proposes the decomposition of quality function deployment matrices simultaneously for both requirements and structure in order to allocate the worth and target cost of the modules in a system. Developed from module concepts that satisfy their target requirements and cost, this new system should better satisfy both customer and financial requirements.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

QFD I (house of quality) and QFD II

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Overview of the methodology

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Schematic of next linear collider

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Schematics of electromagnet and hybrid magnet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Focus of the analysis: structures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Customer, system, and module requirements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Degrees of contribution

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Worth allocation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Worth of modules

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Worth of requirements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Selection of the multipole magnet system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Selection of the permanent magnet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Performance versus cost diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Indifference curve (p∕c=1.5,2,3,8)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Conceptual flow of worth allocation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Simultaneously decomposed QFD matrices and flow of worth

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In