0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Input Torque Balancing Using an Inverted Cam Mechanism

[+] Author and Article Information
Bram Demeulenaere

Mechanical Engineering Department, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgiumbram.demeulenaere@mech.kuleuven.ac.be

Joris De Schutter

Mechanical Engineering Department, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgiumjoris.deschutter@mech.kuleuven.ac.be

Throughout this paper, the term original system will denote the mechanism to be input torque balanced, whereas the compensated system is the ensemble of the original and the ITB mechanism.

The shape of the rotor and the carriage are determined based on the mass parametrization approach discussed in Sec. 4.

J. Mech. Des 127(5), 887-900 (Oct 14, 2004) (14 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1876452 History: Received December 02, 2003; Revised October 14, 2004

Input torque balancing through addition of an auxiliary, input torque balancing mechanism, is a well-known way for reducing drive speed fluctuations in high-speed cam-follower mechanisms. This paper develops a methodology to design and optimize the so-called inverted cam mechanism (ICM), a simple, cam-based input torque balancing mechanism. It was already introduced in the 1950s, but the design methodologies proposed by Meyer zur Capellen (1964) and Michelin (1979) are, respectively, erroneous or too rough an approximation, and are corrected here. The describing equation that governs the ICM cam design, is shown to be a second-order, nonlinear, ordinary differential equation. It is solved by parameterizing its solution as a finite Fourier series, the coefficients of which are determined through a nonlinear least-squares problem. Based on this methodology, an ICM is designed for input torque balancing a high-speed, industrial cam-follower mechanism. The ICM’s design parameters result from a design optimization, which aims at obtaining a compact and technologically feasible mechanism. The optimization problem is solved using a design chart, which is efficiently created based on a nondimensionalized analysis.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Inverted cam mechanism: kinematic scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Design example (ω=900rpm): dimensionalized (left ordinate axis) and nondimensionalized (right ordinate axis) desired cam follower position, velocity, and acceleration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Design example (ω=900rpm): (a) Mc (N m) (full line) and Mo (N m) (dashed line); (b) corresponding torque residual Mc+Mo (N m)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Design example (ω=900rpm): dimensionalized (left ordinate axis) and nondimensionalized (right ordinate axis) ICM pitch radius and its first two derivatives

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Design example: Jeq, Jeq,min, and Jeq,o

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Design example: resulting ICM configuration. Both the X and the Y-axis are expressed in m. The solid boundary indicates the cam against which the upper rolling body rolls. The thin boundary, shown in the left part, and hidden behind the solid boundary in the right part, indicates the cam against which the lower rolling body rolls.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Design example (ω=900rpm): comparison of ICM input torque contributions: (a) component due to r∙ṙ; (b) component due to ṙ∙r̈, and (c) total input torque Mc

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Shape parametrization: front (a) and top (b) view of the rotor and front (c) and top (d) view of the carriage (with the outer bearing ring of diameter Rb present)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Design example: design chart (ω=900rpm). The lowest Jeq-values are situated in the lower left corner. The highest values are found in the upper right corner. The contour lines {100,500,1000} indicate Nmin-values (N). The contour lines {0,0.08} indicate t*-values (m).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Design example (ω=900rpm): contour plots of (a) rmax−rmin (m), (b) ṙmax (m/s), and (c) r̈max(m∕s2) as a function of ξ0 and rmax

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In