0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Multi-Speed Gearbox Design Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

[+] Author and Article Information
Kalyanmoy Deb, Sachin Jain

Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory (KanGAL), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, PIN 208 016, India

J. Mech. Des 125(3), 609-619 (Sep 04, 2003) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1596242 History: Received March 01, 2002; Revised February 01, 2003; Online September 04, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of a gear train
Grahic Jump Location
A random set of 10,000 feasible solutions, four Pareto-optimal solutions obtained in 2, and 100 nondominated solutions obtained by NSGA-II are shown. Only thickness of 18 gears are varied here.
Grahic Jump Location
NSGA-II solutions for the case of module being an additional variable are shown against four Pareto-optimal solutions of Case I (as reported in 2)
Grahic Jump Location
Variation of gear thickness in obtained solutions
Grahic Jump Location
Variation of gear module in obtained solutions
Grahic Jump Location
The bending stress of NSGA-II solutions are shown against the delivered power
Grahic Jump Location
NSGA-II solutions are shown with two limiting errors in output speeds. Gear teeth and thickness are varied here.
Grahic Jump Location
Proportion of obtained solutions having different maximum percentage error in speed ratios is shown for two cases of optimization (with 5% and 10% limiting error)
Grahic Jump Location
The ratio Bi/Ci for all nine gear-pairs observed in different obtained solutions
Grahic Jump Location
NSGA-II solutions for varying gear module, teeth, and thickness are shown. Nondominated fronts for two different ranges of modules are compared with that obtained in Case III (with a fixed module of 0.28 cm). Open circles indicate results when the module is allowed to vary within [0.10,0.41] cm and the triangles indicate results for modules varying in [0.10,0.73] cm.
Grahic Jump Location
Module m obtained in different nondominated solutions for two cases
Grahic Jump Location
NSGA-II solutions for an additional objective of minimizing center distance are compared with NSGA-II solutions with two objectives (maximizing power and minimizing volume)
Grahic Jump Location
Nondominated solutions for four objectives
Grahic Jump Location
Trade-off between ε and center distance for two-objective NSGA-II and Jain and Agogino’s 2 study

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In