0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Synthesis of Inertially Compensated Variable-Speed Cams

[+] Author and Article Information
B. Demeulenaere, J. De Schutter

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300B, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

J. Mech. Des 125(3), 593-601 (Sep 04, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1582502 History: Received June 01, 2001; Revised October 01, 2002; Online September 04, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Angeles, J., and López-Cajún, C., 1991, Optimization of Cam Mechanisms, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mabie, H. H., and Reinholtz, C. F., 1987, Mechanisms and Dynamics of Machinery, Wiley.
Srinivasan,  L. N., and Jeffrey Ge,  Q., 1998, “Designing Dynamically Compensated and Robust Cam Profiles with Bernstein-Bézier Harmonic Curves,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120, pp. 40–45.
Stoddart, D. A., 1953, “Polydyne cam design,” Machine Design, January, pp. 121–135; February, pp. 146–154; March, pp. 149–164.
Chen, F. Y., 1982, Mechanics and Design of Cam Mechanisms, Pergamon Press.
Kanzaki,  K., and Itao,  K., 1972, “Polydyne Cam Mechanisms for Typehead Positioning,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 94, pp. 250–254.
Kwakernaak,  H., and Smit,  J., 1968, “Minimum Vibration Cam Profiles,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 10, pp. 219–227.
Wiederrich,  J. L., and Roth,  B., 1975, “Dynamic Synthesis of Tuned Cam Displacement Curves Using Finite Trigonometric Series,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 97, pp. 287–293.
Chew,  M., and Chuang,  C. H., 1995, “Minimizing Residual Vibrations in High-Speed Cam-Follower Systems Over a Range of Speeds,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117, pp. 166–172.
Chew,  M., Freudenstein,  F., and Longman,  R. W., 1993, “Application of Optimal Control Theory to the Synthesis of High-Speed Cam-Follower Systems, Part 1: Optimality Criteria, Part 2: System Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Trans. Auto. Des., 105, pp. 576–591.
Fabien,  B. C., Longman,  R. W., and Freudenstein,  F., 1994, “The Design of High-Speed Dwell-Rise-Dwell Tuned Cam Displacement Curves Using Linear Quadratic Optimal Control Theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, pp. 867–874.
Koster,  M. P., 1975, “Effect of Flexibility of Driving Shaft on the Dynamic Behavior of a Cam Mechanism,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 97, pp. 595–602.
Nishioka, M., 1995, “State of the Art of Torque Compensation Cam Mechanisms,” Proc. 9th World Congress on the Theory of Machine and Mechanisms, pp. 713–717, Milan, Italy.
Dooner,  D. B., 1997, “Use of Noncircular Gears to Reduce Torque and Speed Fluctuations in Rotating Shafts,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119, pp. 299–306.
Rothbart, H. A., 1956, Cams-Design, Dynamics, and Accuracy, Wiley.
Yan,  H. S., Tsai,  M. C., and Hsu,  M. H., 1999, “A Variable-Speed Method for Improving Motion Characteristics of Cam-Follower Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, pp. 250–258.
Hsu, M. H., and Chen, W. R., 1999, “On the Design of Speed Function for Improving Torque Characteristics of Cam-Follower Systems,” Proc. 10th World Congress on the Theory of Machine and Mechanisms, pp. 272–277, Oulu, Finland.
Liu,  H. T. J., 1997, “Synthesis and Steady-State Analysis of High-Speed Elastic Cam-Actuated Linkages with Fluctuated Speeds by a Finite Element Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119, pp. 395–402.
Van de Straete,  H. J., and De Schutter,  J., 1999, “Optimal Variable Transmission Ratio and Trajectory for an Inertial Load with Respect to Servo Motor Size,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 121, pp. 544–551.
Swevers,  J., Ganseman,  C., Tükel,  D., De Schutter,  J., and Van Brussel,  H., 1997, “Optimal Robot Excitation and Identification,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom., 13, pp. 730–739.
Pisano,  A. P., and Freudenstein,  F., 1983, “An Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Dynamic Response of a High-Speed Cam-Follower System. Part 1: Experimental Investigation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 105, pp. 692–698.
Pisano,  A. P., 1984, “Coulomb Friction in High-Speed Cam Systems,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 106, pp. 470–474.
Hanachi,  S., and Freudenstein,  F., 1986, “The Development of a Predictive Model for the Optimization of High-Speed Cam-Follower Systems with Coulomb Damping, Internal Friction and Elastic and Fluidic Elements,” ASME J. Mech. Trans. Auto. Des., 108, pp. 506–515.
Ünlüsoy,  Y. S., and Tümer,  S. T., 1994, “Non-linear Dynamic Model and Its Solution for a High-Speed Cam Mechanism with Coulomb Friction,” J. Sound Vib., 169, pp. 395–407.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic representation of a cam-follower system with N=2 (oscillating) followers
Grahic Jump Location
Desired position fi(t) [rad] for the three (i=1[[ellipsis]]3) followers of the cam-follower system. The three followers perform the same movement, shifted in time (Θi=−0.3272 rad,i=1[[ellipsis]]3).  
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Dimensionless desired speed θi(τ) [-] for the three (i=1[[ellipsis]]3) followers of the cam-follower system, after the beginning of the motion cycle has been moved to the point where εfol(τ) is minimal; (b) dimensionless camshaft speed ϕ(τ): the dashed line indicates the average value ϕave=0.6317.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Dimensionless kinetic energy εmot(τ) of the equivalent camshaft inertia for the VAR-system (full line) and the CON-system (dashed line); (b) dimensionless kinetic energy εfol(τ) of the followers; (c) total dimensionless kinetic energy ε(τ)=εmot(τ)+εfol(τ) for the VAR-system (full line) and the CON-system (dashed line).
Grahic Jump Location
(a)-(b)-(c) Cam motion law (and its derivatives w.r.t. g) of the first cam-follower configuration (i=1), for the VAR-system (full line) and the CON-system (dashed line); (d)-(e)-(f ) difference ΔF1(n)(g)=F1,VAR(n)(g)−F1,CON(n)(g) between the VAR and the CON-motion law (and its derivatives) for the first cam-follower configuration.  
Grahic Jump Location
The value of J0 as a function of δ, on a logarithmic scale
Grahic Jump Location
Cam profile of the slave cam of the first cam-follower configuration (i=1) for five different values of δ, i.e., δ=0.1,δ=0.3,δ=0.5,δ=0.7, and δ=0.9. The arrows indicate increasing values of δ.
Grahic Jump Location
Properties of the slave cam of the first cam-follower configuration (i=1) as a function of δ: (a) maximum pressure angle; (b) maximum Hertzian pressure; (c) minimum positive radius of curvature; (d) maximum cutter radius.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Maximum deviation max(Δġ(t)) of the camshaft speed for the VAR-systems; (b) maximum deviation max(Δġ(t)) of the camshaft speed for the CON-systems; (c) ratio ρ1 (on a dB-scale) of the max(Δġ(t)) values for corresponding CON and VAR-systems.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) RMS-value of the motor torque Tmot(t) for the VAR-systems; (b) RMS-value of the motor torque Tmot(t) for the CON-systems; (c) ratio ρ2 (on a dB-scale) of the RMS-values for corresponding CON and VAR-systems.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Maximum deviation max(Δf1(t)) of the position of the first follower (i=1) for the VAR-systems; (b) maximum deviation max(Δf1(t)) of the position of the first follower (i=1) for the CON-systems; (c) ratio ρ3 (on a dB-scale) of the max(Δf1(t)) values for corresponding CON and VAR-systems.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In