0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

An Economic Design Change Method

[+] Author and Article Information
Christoph Roser

Toyota Central R&D Labs, Nagoya, Japane-mail: croser@robotics.tytlabs.co.jp

David Kazmer, James Rinderle

  University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA

J. Mech. Des 125(2), 233-239 (Jun 11, 2003) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1561040 History: Received December 01, 1999; Revised June 01, 2002; Online June 11, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Topics: Design
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Design space with sub spaces
Grahic Jump Location
Design model uncertainty and relationships among design change variables
Grahic Jump Location
Probability density of design change options “A” (left peak) and “B”
Grahic Jump Location
Probability of defect resolution for two change options as a function of defect magnitude
Grahic Jump Location
Expected profit for basic alternatives A, B, and C as a function of defect magnitude
Grahic Jump Location
Expected profit for basic alternatives and simple combinations of alternatives
Grahic Jump Location
A comparison of expected profits for different conditional sequences of basic alternatives A and B
Grahic Jump Location
Most profitable design change sequences for the I-beam problem

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In