0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Design Synthesis of Path Generating Compliant Mechanisms by Evolutionary Optimization of Topology and Shape

[+] Author and Article Information
Kang Tai, Guang Yu Cui, Tapabrata Ray

Center for Advanced Numerical Engineering Simulations, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore

J. Mech. Des 124(3), 492-500 (Aug 06, 2002) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1480818 History: Received April 01, 2001; Online August 06, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Howell, L. L., and Midha, A., 1993, “Compliant Mechanisms,” Modern Kinematics: Developments in the Last Forty Years, Erdman, A. G., ed., John Wiley, New York, pp. 422–428.
Her,  I., and Midha,  A., 1987, “A Compliance Number Concept for Compliant Mechanisms, and Type Synthesis,” ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des., 109, pp. 348–355.
Howell,  L. L., and Midha,  A., 1995, “Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 117, pp. 156–165.
Bendsoe,  M. P., and Kikuchi,  N., 1988, “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 71, pp. 197–224.
Yang,  R. J., and Chuang,  C. H., 1994, “Optimal Topology Design Using Linear Programming,” Comput. Struct., 52, pp. 265–275.
Zhou,  M., and Rozvany,  G. I. N., 1991, “The COC Algorithm, Part II: Topological, Geometrical and Generalized Shape Optimization,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 89, pp. 309–336.
Ananthasuresh, G. K., Kota, S., and Kikuchi, N., 1994, “Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant MEMS,” Dynamic Systems and Control (Vol. 2 of 2) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic Systems and Control Division (Publication) DSC. v 55-2 1994, Radcliffe, C.J., ed., ASME, New York, pp. 677–686.
Frecker,  M. I., Ananthasuresh,  G. K., Nishiwaki,  S., Kikuchi,  N., and Kota,  S., 1997, “Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Criteria Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119, pp. 238–245.
Sigmund,  O., 1997, “On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization,” Mech. Struct. Mach. 25, pp. 493–524.
Larsen,  U. D., Sigmund,  O., and Bouwstra,  S., 1997, “Design and Fabrication of Compliant Micromechanisms and Structures with Negative Poisson’s Ratio,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 6, pp. 99–106.
Hetrick,  J. A., and Kota,  S., 1999, “An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 121, pp. 229–234.
Tai, K., Cui, G. Y., and Ray, T., 2000, “Design Synthesis of Path Generating Compliant Mechanisms by Evolutionary Optimization of Topology and Shape,” 2000 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 10-13 September 2000, paper no. DETC2000/DAC14518.
Howell,  L. L., and Midha,  A., 1996, “A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, pp. 121–125.
Saxena, A., 2000, “Topology Optimization of Geometrically Nonlinear Compliant Mechanisms for Flexibility, Stiffness and Strength,” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Saxena,  A., and Ananthasuresh,  G. K., 2001, “Topology Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms for Nonlinear Force-Deflection and Curved Path Specifications,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 123, pp. 33–42.
Chapman,  C. D., Saitou,  K., and Jakiela,  M. J., 1994, “Genetic Algorithms as an Approach to Configuration and Topology Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, pp. 1005–1012.
Chapman,  C. D., and Jakiela,  M. J., 1996, “Genetic Algorithm-Based Structural Topology Design with Compliance and Topology Simplification Considerations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, pp. 89–98.
Duda,  J. W., and Jakiela,  M. J., 1997, “Generation and Classification of Structural Topologies with Genetic Algorithm Speciation,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119, pp. 127–131.
Jakiela,  M. J., Chapman,  C., Duda,  J., Adewuya,  A., and Saitou,  K., 2000, “Continuum Structural Topology Design with Genetic Algorithms,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 186, pp. 339–356.
Tai, K., and Chee, T. H., 1998, “Genetic Algorithm With Structural Morphology Representation for Topology Design Optimization,” Mechanics in Design—Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mechanics in Design, Gentle, C. R. and Hull, J. B., ed., Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, pp. 827–836.
Michalewicz, Z., 1994, Genetic Algorithms+Data Structures=Evolution Programs, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Schoenauer, M., 1995, “Shape Representations for Evolutionary Optimization and Identification in Structural Mechanics,” Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science, Winter, G., Periaux, J., Galan, M. and Cuesta, P., ed., John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 443–464.
Tai,  K., and Chee,  T. H., 2000, “Design of Structures and Compliant Mechanisms by Evolutionary Optimization of Morphological Representations of Topology,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 122, pp. 560–566.
Cui, G. Y., Tai, K., and Wang, B. P., 2000, “Optimum Design of Structures for Maximum Natural Frequency Using Simulated Annealing and Morphological Representation,” 41st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 3-6 April 2000, paper no. AIAA-2000-1393.
Ray, T., Tai, K., and Seow, K. C., 2000, “An Evolutionary Algorithm for Constrained Optimization,” Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), Whitley, D., Goldberg, D. E., Cantu-Paz, E., Spector, L., Parmee, I. C. and Beyer, H. G., ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 771–777.
Ray,  T., Tai,  K., and Seow,  K. C., 2001, “Multiobjective Design Optimization by an Evolutionary Algorithm,” Eng. Optimiz., 33, pp. 399–424.
Mortenson, M. E., 1997, Geometric Modeling, 2nd Ed., John Wiley, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Design space with input/output regions shaded
Grahic Jump Location
Deviation between desired and actual trajectories
Grahic Jump Location
Definition of structural geometry by morphological scheme
Grahic Jump Location
Thickness of “flesh” added to skeleton elements
Grahic Jump Location
Description of information in the chromosome code
Grahic Jump Location
Crossover operation on control point element position
Grahic Jump Location
Crossover operation on input point element position
Grahic Jump Location
Working principle of the evolutionary algorithm
Grahic Jump Location
Design space definition
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between desired and actual trajectories (#1)
Grahic Jump Location
Two sample designs from initial generation (trajectory #1)
Grahic Jump Location
Evolution of designs (trajectory #1)
Grahic Jump Location
Optimum design (trajectory #1)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between desired and actual trajectories (#2)
Grahic Jump Location
Two sample designs from initial generation (trajectory #2)
Grahic Jump Location
Evolution of designs (trajectory #2)
Grahic Jump Location
Optimum design (trajectory #2)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In