Effects of Taper Variation on Conical Threaded Connections Load Distribution

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Baragetti, Ph.D.

Dip. to Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, P.zza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy

J. Mech. Des 124(2), 320-329 (May 16, 2002) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1456459 History: Received July 01, 2000; Online May 16, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Maduschka,  L., 1936, “Beansprukung von Schraubenverbindungen und zweckmaβige Gestaltung der Gewindeträger,” Forsch. 7, pp. 299–305.
Sopwith, D.G., 1948, “The Distribution of Load in Screw Threads,” Inst. Mech. Engrs. Appl. Mech. Proc., 159, pp. 373- 383.
Bruschelli,  L., and Latorrata,  V., 1999, “The Influence of ‘Shell Behavior’ on Load Distribution for Thin-Walled Conical Joints,” ASME J. Appl. Mech. 67, pp. 298–306.
Baragetti, S., Baryshnikov, A., Guagliano, M., Terranova, A., and Vergani, L., 1999, “Sollecitazioni in giunzioni coniche filettate: risultati numerici e sperimentali,” Convegno Nazionale AIAS ‘99, Vicenza, Italy.
Zhao,  H., 1996, “A Numerical Method for Load Distribution in Threaded Connections,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 118, pp. 274–279.
Zhao,  H., 1998, “Stress Concentration Factors within Bolt-Nut Connectors Under Elasto-Plastic Deformation,” Int. J. Fatique 20, No. 9, pp. 651–659.
Barry, W. R., 1975, “Finite Element Analysis of Casing Threads,” Proc. ASME Petroleum Mech. Engng. Conf., Tulsa, Oklahoma.
O’Hara, P., 1974, “Finite Element Analysis of Threaded Connections,” Proc. Army Symp. Solid Mech., Bass River, Mass.
Baragetti, S., and Clerici, P., 1999, “Structural Behavior of Drill Collar Threaded Connections Under Make-up and Axial Static Applied Loads,” Test Report, Politecnico di Milano.
Chen,  J. J., and Shih,  Y. S., 1999, “A Study of the Helical Effect on the Thread Connection by Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, No. 191, pp. 109–116.
Farr, A. P., 1957, “Torque Requirements For Rotary Shouldered Connections,” Oil & Gas J.
Bailey, E. I., and Smith, J. E., 1992, “Testing thread compound for Rotary-Shouldered Connections,” SPE/IADC 23844, IADC/SPE Drilling Conference.
Baryshnikov, A., Ferrara, P., Schenato, A., and Curioni, E., 1995, “Makeup Torque and Rotary Shouldered Connection Reliability,” SPE/IADC 29352, IADC/SPE Drilling Conference.
Baryshnikov, A., Ferrara, P., Toffolo, G., and Donati, F., 1998, “Drillstring Components Serviceability: Standards and Practices,” 2nd ARPO Convention Proceedings, ENI-Agip, Milan, Italy.
Baryshnikov, A., Donati, F., Toffolo, G., and Ferrara, P., 1998, “Recommendations Could Improve the Serviceability of Drillstring Components,” World Oil, July, 1998.
Sherbuk,  N. , Gazanchan,  J., Semin,  V., and Baryshnikov,  A., 1987, “Make-up Torque Influence on Shouldered Thread Connection Fatigue Resistance,” Oil Economy J., Russia, No. 10 (in Russian).
API Standard, 1994, “Specification for Rotary Drill Stem Elements-Specification,” 7, 38th edition.
API Recommended Practice, 1995, “Recommended Practice for Drill Stem Design and Operating Limits,” RP 7G, Fourteenth edition.
API Recommended Practice, 1992, “Recommended Practice for Testing of Thread Compound for Rotary Shouldered Connections,” First edition.
ISO/TC67/SC4 Standard, First working draft, 1999, “Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries—Material, Equipment and Offshore Structures—Threading, Gauging and Testing of Rotary Shouldered Thread Connections.”
Baragetti, S., Baryshnikov, A., Clerici, P., and Matteazzi, S., “Make-up of Rotary Shouldered Connections: Experiments in Various Conditions,” Submitted for publication.
Carlin, F., and Saunders, D., 1985, “Tool-joint Thread Redesign Cuts Stress, Increases Fatigue Life,” Oil and Gas Journal, July.
Tsukano, Y., Nishi, S., Nishida, S. I., and Ueno, M., 1990, “Improvement of Drill-Collar fatigue property by Last-Engaged-Thread-Height reduction of pin,” SPEDE, December.
Maney, J. J., Strozier, C. A., 1989, “High-Temperature Performance of Rotary-Shouldered Connections," SPE paper 19554, 64th SPE Annual Technical Confernce, San Antonio, Texas, October 8–11.
Weatherford, Int’L., 1994, “Lube-Guard High Temperature-High Pressure Tool Joint Compound,” Product Information, Oil Center Research Inc., USA.
Sato,  T., and Besshi,  T., 1998, “Anti-galling evaluation in aluminum sheet forming,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 83, pp 185–191.
Carper,  H. J., Ertas,  A., and Cuvalci,  O., 1995, “Rating Thread Compounds for Galling Resistance,” ASME J. Tribol. 117, pp 639–645.
Hopkins,  A. N., Harrington,  C. D., and Black,  B. R., 1999, “Reduce Maintenance Costs by Using Engineered Surfaces to Control Friction and Galling,” Wear 225-229, pp. 27–37.
Baragetti,  S., and Baryshnikov,  A., 2001. “Rotary Shouldered Thread Connections: Working Limits Under Combined Static Loading,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 123, pp. 456–463.
Borzini, E., De Lorentiis, G., 1999, “Studio della distribuzione del carico nella filettatura di giunzioni coniche: modelli numerici e prove sperimentali,” Degree Thesis, Politecnico di Milano.
Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., 1999, ABAQUS/Standard 5.8 User’s Manual.
PDA Engineering, Patran Division, 1999, P3/Patran User Manual, Vols. 1, 2, 3, 4, California.


Grahic Jump Location
Dimensioned sketches of the pin and box elements and of the thread (linear dimensions in millimeters)
Grahic Jump Location
Finite element model of the API standard NC50 connection
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Magnified section of the threads engaged; (b) strip of material belonging to the terminal part of the box element
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Relationship between temperature increase and internal axial induced load, for the standard NC50 connection; (b) RFL trend induced by the application of make-up torque equal to 24×103 Nm; (c) conventions used to number the pin and box threads
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Trend of the axial, circumferential and radial stresses; (b) of the contact pressure on the first thread engaged (make-up torque =24×103 Nm)
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Experimental equipment; (b) strain gages set up (all dimensions in millimeters)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the numerical and experimental results respectively for the NC50 standard connection and for the modified one: induced shoulder axial loads Qup equal to (a)435×103 N and (b)1,525×103 N
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the trends of the RFL parameter obtained by using three different taper values for the pin element: standard taper equal to 166.66×10−3 m/m, 156.66×10−3 m/m, and 158.36×10−3 m/m (make-up torque=24×103 Nm)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the trends of the contact pressures on the first thread engaged “1” obtained by using three different taper values for the pin element: standard taper equal to 166.66×10−3 m/m, 156.66×10−3 m/m, and 158.36×10−3 m/m (make-up torque=24×103 Nm)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the trends of the Von Mises stresses for the different thread sections of the pin element obtained by using (a) a pin taper value of 156.66×10−3 m/m and (b) a standard pin taper value of 166.66×10−3 m/m (make-up torque=24×103 Nm)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In