0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Topology Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms for Nonlinear Force-Deflection and Curved Path Specifications

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Saxena, G. K. Ananthasuresh

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315

J. Mech. Des 123(1), 33-42 (Sep 01, 1999) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1333096 History: Received September 01, 1999
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Howell,  L., and Midha,  A., 1996, “A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, No. 1, pp. 121–125.
Saxena,  A., and Kramer,  S. N., 1998, “A Simple and Accurate Method for Determining Large Deflections in Compliant Mechanisms Subjected to End Forces and Moments,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120, No. 3, pp. 392–400.
Ananthasuresh, G. K., Kota, S., and Kikuchi, N., 1994, “Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant MEMS,” Proc. of the 1994 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Nov. 1994, Chicago, IL, pp. 677–686.
Frecker,  M. I., Ananthasuresh,  G. K., Nishiwaki,  N., Kikuchi,  N., and Kota,  S., 1997, “Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms using Multi-Criteria Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 119 pp. 238–245.
Sigmund,  O., 1997, “On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization,” Mech. Struct. Mach.,25, No. 4, pp. 495–526.
Saxena, A., Wang, X., and Ananthasuresh, G. K., 2000, “PennSyn: A Topology Synthesis Software for Compliant Mechanisms DETC/MECH-14139,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September, 10–13, Baltimore, MD.
Nishiwaki,  S., Frecker,  M. I., Min,  S., and Kikuchi,  N., 1998, “Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms using the Homogenization Method,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 42, pp. 535–559.
Saxena, A., and Ananthasuresh, G. K., 1998, “An Optimality Criteria Approach for the Topology Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms-DETC/’99 DAC,” Proceedings of the DETC’98, ASME Design, Engineering Technical Conference, Sept. 13–16, Atlanta, Georgia, DETC98/MECH-5937.
Saxena,  A., and Ananthasuresh,  G. K., 2000, “On an Optimal Property of Compliant Mechanisms,” Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim.,19, No. 1, pp. 36–49.
Larsen, V. D., Sigmund, O., and Bouwstra, S., 1996, “Design and Fabrication of Compliant Mechanisms and Structures with Negative Poisson’s Ratio,” IEEE, International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS-96.
Hetrick,  J. A., and Kota,  S., 1999, “An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 121, No. 2, pp. 229–234.
Bruns, T. E., and Tortorelli, D. A., 1998, “Topology Optimization of Geometrically Nonlinear Structures and Compliant Mechanisms,” Proc. of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA-98-4950, pp. 1874–1882.
Buhl,  T., Claus,  B., Pedersen,  W., and Sigmund,  O., 1999, “Stiffness Design of Geometrically Nonlinear Structures using Topology Optimization,” DCAMM Report No 614, Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Apr. 1999.
Pedersen, C., Buhl, T., and Sigmund, O., 1999, “Topology Synthesis of Large Displacement Compliant Mechanisms,” Proceedings of 1999 ASME-DETC, Las Vegas, September, DETC99/DAC-8554.
Crisfield, M. A., 1991, Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons Limited, Baffins Lane, Chichester, PO19 1UD, England.
Bathe, K. J., 1996, Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632.
Matlab™, 2000, The Language of Technical Computing, Student Edition, 5th Ed., The MathWorks Inc., 24 Prime Park Way, Natick, MA, 01760-1500.
ABAQUS™, 1996, Abaqus/Standard User’s Manual, Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. 1080 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI 02860-4847, Ver. 5.6.
Santos,  J. L. T., and Choi,  K. K., 1992, “Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Systems,” Struct. Optim.,4, pp. 23–35.
Choi,  K. K., and Huag,  E. J., 1983, “Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Elastic Structures,” J. Struct. Mech.,11, pp. 231–269.
Choi,  K. K., and Santos,  J. L. T., 1987, “Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Systems, Part I: Theory,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 24, pp. 2039–2055.
Santos,  J. L. T., and Choi,  K. K., 1988, “Sizing Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Structural Systems. Part II: Numerical Method,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 26, pp. 2097–2114.
Ryu,  Y. S., Haririan,  M., Wu,  C. C., and Arora,  J. S., 1985, “Structural Design Sensitivity Analysis of Nonlinear Response,” Comput. Struct., 21, pp. 245–255.
Claus,  B., Pedersen,  W., Buhl,  T., and Sigmund,  O., 2000, “Topology Synthesis of Large Displacement Compliant Mechanisms,” DCAMM Report No 631, Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Jan. 2000.
Yahya, R., 1999, “One Piece Compliant Disk-Drive Loading Mechanism,” Capstone design project report, Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Two-point force-deflection synthesis of a compliant crimper (a) optimal topology for design case I (b) convergence history
Grahic Jump Location
Two-point force-deflection synthesis of a compliant crimper (a) optimal topology for design case II (b) convergence history
Grahic Jump Location
Two-point force-deflection synthesis of a compliant crimper (a) optimal topology for design case III (b) convergence history
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of nonlinear force-deflection characteristics of the crimper designs ( Figs. 8910)
Grahic Jump Location
Design specifications for prescribed curved output path
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Design domain for compliant pliers (b) optimal pliers topology for specifications in Table 2 (c) output displacement trajectory for the optimal topology
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Optimal pliers topology for specifications in Table 3 (b) output displacement trajectory for the optimal topology
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Design domain for the floppy drive loading mechanism (b) optimal topology (c) output displacement trajectory
Grahic Jump Location
Design domain for two-point compliant crimper force-deflection synthesis
Grahic Jump Location
Topological synthesis of a micro displacement amplifier. (a) Design specifications; F=500 μN (b) convergence history for topology optimization (c) full section design of the displacement amplifier (d) displaced profile; geometric advantage is 6.2 (e) optimal topology for F=100 μN.
Grahic Jump Location
Design sensitivity comparison with the displacement inverter example (a) input-output specifications (b) finite element mesh (c) comparison between analytical and finite difference sensitivities for the output displacement, maximum error=0.02%
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of a cantilever beam in Matlab for a vertical end force of −20 N. (b) Comparison of the output port deformation for a symmetric half of the deformed compliant crimper.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Linear and nonlinear force-deflection relationship for the one-dimensional bar in Fig. 2 (b) tangent stiffness matrix, Kt and its constituents (E=2×105 N/mm2,A=250 mm2,yo=25 mm,l=2500 mm,Ks=1.35 N/mm)
Grahic Jump Location
A bar with geometrically nonlinear deformation
Grahic Jump Location
Synthesis capabilities using nonlinear finite element analysis (a) quantitative accuracy for large deformations (b) prescribed nonlinear force-deflection specifications (c) curved output paths

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In