Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage

[+] Author and Article Information
H. Li, S. Azarm

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

J. Mech. Des 122(4), 411-418 (Sep 01, 1999) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1311788 History: Received September 01, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Miettinen, K., 1999, Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.
Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O., 1947, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Thurston,  D. L., Carnahan,  J. V., and Liu,  T., 1994, “Optimization of Design Utility,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, pp. 801–808.
Marston, M., and Mistree, F., 1998, “An Implementation of Expected Utility Theory in Design Based Design,” CD-ROM Proceedings of 1998 DETC, 10th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, September 13–16, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tian,  Y. Q., Thurston,  D. L., and Carnahan,  J. V., 1994, “Incorporating End-User’s Attributes Towards Uncertainty into an Expert System,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, pp. 493–500.
Whitcomb, C. A., 1998, “A Prescriptive Production-Distribution Approach for Decision Making in Product Design Engineering,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Whitcomb,  C. A., Palli,  N., and Azarm,  S., 1999, “A Prescriptive Production- Distribution Approach for Decision Making in New Product Design,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 29, No. 3, pp. 336–348.
Green,  P. E., and Krieger,  A. M., 1985, “Models and Heuristics for Product Line Selection,” Market. Sci., 4, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
McBride,  R. D., and Zufryden,  F. S., 1988, “An Integer Programming Approach to the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem,” Market. Sci., 7, No. 2, pp. 126–140.
Kohli,  R., and Sukumar,  R., 1990, “Heuristic for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis,” Manage. Sci., 36, No. 12, pp. 1464–1477.
Dobson,  G., and Kalish,  S., 1993, “Heuristics for Pricing and Positioning a Product-Line Using Conjoint Analysis and Cost Data,” Manage. Sci., 39, No. 2, pp. 160–175.
Hazelrigg, G. A., 1996, System Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Hazelrigg,  G. A., 1998, “A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 120, pp. 653–658.
Pekelman,  D., and Sen,  S., 1979, “Measurement and Estimation of Conjoint Utility Functions,” J. Consum. Res., 5, pp. 263–271.
Pekelman,  D., and Sen,  S., 1979, “Improving Prediction in Conjoint Measurement,” J. Mar. Res., XVI, pp. 211–220.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
De Neufville, R., 1990, Applied Systems Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Park, C. S., and Sharp-Bette, G. P., 1990, Advanced Engineering Economics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Green, P. E., and Rao, V. R., 1971, “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data,” J. Mar. Res., No. 8 355–363.
Green,  P. E., and Srinivasan,  V., 1978, “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,” J. Consum. Res., 5, pp. 103–123.
Johnston, J., 1972, Econometric Methods, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kruskal,  J. B., 1965, “Analysis of Factorial Experiments by Estimating Monotone Transformations of the Data,” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 27, pp. 251–263.
French, M. J., and Widden, M. B., 1993, “Function-Costing: A Promising Aid to Early Cost Estimation,” Proceedings of ASME Design Technical Conferences, Design for Manufacture, DE-Vol. 52, ASME Pub, pp. 85–90.
Mileham,  A. R., Currie,  G. C., Miles,  A. W., and Bradford,  D. T., 1993, “A Parametric Approach to Cost Estimating at the Conceptual Stage of Design,” J. Eng. Des., 4, No. 2, pp. 117–125.
Narayanan,  S., and Azarm,  S., 1999, “On Improving Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Design Optimization,” Struct. Optim., 32, pp. 146–155.
Hauser,  J. R., and Urban,  G. L., 1979, “Assessment of Attribute Importances and Consumer Utility Functions: von Neumann-Maorgenstern Theory Applied to Consumer Behavior,” J. Consum. Res., 5, pp. 251–262.


Grahic Jump Location
Designer’s utility vs. price and warranty
Grahic Jump Location
A bottom-up layout of the overall approach
Grahic Jump Location
Flowchart for the design alternative evaluation stage
Grahic Jump Location
Flowchart for modeling of demand and market share
Grahic Jump Location
Probability density function for a triangular distribution
Grahic Jump Location
Normalized attribute levels for 8 Pareto solutions
Grahic Jump Location
Flowchart of Monte Carlo simulation
Grahic Jump Location
Designer’s utility of design alternatives
Grahic Jump Location
Designer’s utility vs. different Pareto solutions




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In