Plastic Collapse of Stainless Steel Optical Tubes Used in Steel Armored Cables

[+] Author and Article Information
Oscar F. “Erik” Slotboom

University of Texas at Austin, 6000 Shepherd Mountain Cove, #2202, Austin, TX 78730erik.slotboom@bus.utexas.edu

J. Mech. Des 122(2), 219-227 (Mar 01, 1999) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.533563 History: Received March 01, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
(a) Collapse of helical optical tube in laboratory testing, cable #3 of Table 3. (b) Actual field failure of helical optical tube, cable #8 of Table 3.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) EOM cable cross section with central optical tube (cable #1 in Table 3) and (b) three helical optical tubes (cable #5 in Table 3)
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Radially directed force on helical optical tube and (b) observed collapse pattern of tube
Grahic Jump Location
EOM cable with concentric copper serve over central 1.32 mm optical tube (cable #2 of Table 3). This design concentrates pressure on the optical tube, since the copper serve does not carry tangential load but transmits the pressure it sustains directly to the central tube.
Grahic Jump Location
Typical hard cable strain vs. tension response. This applies for all cables, regardless of size and armor steel cross section area. Response values are approximate and will vary from cable to cable. (a) Typical cable where collapse criterion is not achieved. (b) Cable with high tube pressure where the collapse criterion is achieved.
Grahic Jump Location
Planes of maximum shear stress for (a) σzrt, the ordering which exists in the initial plastic zone, (b) σrzt, the ordering which exists when σz becomes negative, and (c) σztr
Grahic Jump Location
Positive internal and external hydrostatic pressure on the thick-walled tube
Grahic Jump Location
Idealized stress-strain diagrams: (a) perfectly plastic, (b) elastic-perfectly plastic, (c) elastic with linear work hardening
Grahic Jump Location
Strain and core pressure for cable design #1
Grahic Jump Location
Cable design #1 stress components for nonhardening and hardening cases with ν=0.5
Grahic Jump Location
Stress distribution across cross section of tube in cable design #1 with cable tension of 44.5 kN. Radial stresses are nearly identical in the hardening and nonhardening cases and are depicted by a single line closest to the stress=0 axis. The legend of Fig. 10 applies.
Grahic Jump Location
Stress calculation for cable #2 of Table 3. The black square represents the cable tension corresponding to the pressure computed by Eq. (30). The legend of Fig. 10 applies.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In