0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Exploration of the Effectiveness of Physical Programming in Robust Design

[+] Author and Article Information
Wei Chen, Atul Sahai

University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Integration & Design Engineering Laboratory, Chicago, IL 60607-7022

Achille Messac, Glynn J. Sundararaj

Northeastern University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Multidisciplinary Design Laboratory, Boston, MA 02115

J. Mech. Des 122(2), 155-163 (Mar 01, 2000) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.533565 History: Received June 01, 1999; Revised March 01, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Taguchi, G., 1993, Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream, ASME, New York.
Box,  G., 1988, “Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations,” Technometrics, 30, No. 1, pp. 1–18.
Nair,  V. N., 1992, “Taguchi’s Parameter Design: A Panel Discussion,” Technometrics, 34, No. 2, pp. 127–161.
Parkinson,  A., Sorensen,  C., and Pourhassan,  N., 1993, “A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design,” Trans. ASME, 115, pp. 74–80.
Sundaresan,  S., Ishii,  K., and Houser,  D. R., 1993, “A Robust Optimization Procedure with Variations on Design Variables and Constraints,” Adv. Des. Autom. ASME DE-Vol., 69-1, pp. 379–386.
Chen,  W., Allen,  J. K., Mistree,  F., and Tsui,  K.-L., 1996, “A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 118, pp. 478–485.
Su,  J., and Renaud,  J. E., 1997, “Automatic Differentiation in Robust Optimization,” AIAA J., 35, No. 6, p. 1072.
Messac, A., and Sundararaj, G. J., 2000, “A Robust Design Approach Using Physical Programming,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, Jan. 10–13.
Das,  I., and Dennis,  J. E., 1997, “A Closer Look at Drawbacks of Minimizing Weighted Sums of Objectives for Pareto set Generation in Multicriteria Optimization Problems,” Struct. Opt., 14, pp. 63–69.
Steuer, R. E., 1989, Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application, John Wiley, New York.
Iyer, H. V., and Krishnamurty, S., 1998, “A Preference-Based Robust Design Metric,” ASME Design Technical Conference, paper no. DAC5625, Atlanta, GA.
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern., O., 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Keeney, R. L., and Raifa, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objective: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley, New York.
Hazelrigg, G. A., 1996, Systems Engineering and Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Chen,  W., Wiecek,  M., and Zhang,  J., 1999, “Quality Utility: A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 121, No. 2, pp. 179–187.
Yu,  P. L., 1973, “A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems,” Manage. Sci., 19, pp. 936–946.
Zeleny, M., 1973, Compromise Programming, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Cochrane, J. L., and Zeleny, M., eds., University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, pp. 262–301.
Messac,  A., 1996, “Physical Programming: Effective Optimization for Computational Design,” AIAA J., 34, No. 1, pp. 149–158.
Messac,  A., and Hattis,  P., 1996, “Physical Programming Design Optimization for High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT),” AIAA J. Aircraft, 33, No. 2, pp. 446–449.
Messac,  A., and Wilson,  B., 1998, “Physical Programming for Computational Control,” AIAA J., 36, No. 2, pp. 219–226.
Messac, A., Sundararaj, G. J., Tappeta, R. V., and Renaud, J. E., 1999, “The Ability of Objective Functions to Generate Non-Convex Pareto Frontiers,” 40 AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Apr. 12–15, St. Louis, MO. Paper #99-1211, AIAA J., 38 , No. 3, Mar. 2000.
Messac, A., and Chen, X., 1999, “Visualizing the Optimization Process in Real-Time Using Physical Programming,” Engineering Optimization Journal, in press.
Messac,  A., 2000, “From the Dubious Construction of Objective Functions to the Application of Physical Programming,” AIAA J., 38, No. 1, pp. 155–163.
Messac, A., Melachrinoudis, E., Sukam, C. P., 2000, “Physical Programming: A Mathematical Perspective,” 38th Aerospace Science Meeting, Reno, NV, Jan. 10–13.
Messac, A., and Sundararaj, G. J., 2000, “Physical Programming’s Ability to Generate a Well-Distributed Set of Pareto Points,” AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Apr. 3–6, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bowman,  V. J., 1976, “On the Relationship of the Tchebycheff Norm and the Efficient Frontier of Multiple-criteria Objectives,” Lecture Notes Econom. Math. Syst., 135, pp. 76–85.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Generating efficient solutions by the WS method
Grahic Jump Location
Generating efficient solutions by the Weighted-Tchebycheff method
Grahic Jump Location
Classification of preference for each design metric
Grahic Jump Location
Class-function ranges for the i-th generic design metric
Grahic Jump Location
Physical programming mappings
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of efficient solutions for the mathematical problem
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of Efficient solutions for propulsion system design problem

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In