Kinematic Analysis and Optimization of a New Three Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Parallel Manipulator

[+] Author and Article Information
J. A. Carretero, R. P. Podhorodeski, M. A. Nahon

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3P6

C. M. Gosselin

Département de Génie Mécanique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4e-mail: gosselin@gmc.ULaval.CA

J. Mech. Des 122(1), 17-24 (Dec 01, 1999) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.533542 History: Received September 01, 1998; Revised December 01, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Gough,  V. E., and Whitehall,  S. G., 1962, “Universal Tyre Test Machine,” Proceedings of 9th. Int. Congress of F.I.S.I.T.A., 117, pp. 117–135.
Stewart, D., 1965, “A Platform With Six Degrees of Freedom,” Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineering, London, UK, Vol. 180, pp. 371–386.
Merlet, J.-P., 1996, “Workspace-Oriented Methodology for Designing a Parallel Manipulator,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 3726–3731.
Merlet,  J.-P., and Gosselin,  C. M., 1990, “Nouvelle Architecture Pour un Manipulateur Parallèle à Six Degrés De Liberté,” Mechan. Machine Theory, 26, No. 1, pp. 77–90.
Nahon, M., Ricard, R., and Gosselin, C. M., 1995, “A Comparison of Flight Simulator Motion-Base Architectures,” Proceedings of the CEAS Symposium on Simulation Technology, pp. 1–16.
Pouliot,  N. A., Nahon,  M. A., and Gosselin,  C. M., 1998, “Motion Simulation Capabilities of Three-Degrees-Of-Freedom Flight Simulators,” AIAA J. Aircraft, 35, No. 1, pp. 9–17.
Lee,  K., and Shah,  D., 1988, “Kinematic Analysis of a Three-Degree-Of-Freedom In-Parallel Actuated Manipulator,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom., 4, No. 3, pp. 354–360.
Tahmashebi,  F., and Tsai,  L.-W., 1995, “On the Stiffness of a Novel Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator,” J. Robot. Syst., 12, No. 12, pp. 845–856.
Ben-Horin, R., and Shoham, M., 1996, “Construction of a Six-Degrees-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator with Three Planarly Actuated Links,” Proceedings of the 24th ASME Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Irvine, California, Paper No. 96-DETC/MECH-1561, 7 pp.
Yang, P.-H., Waldron, K. J., and Orin, D. E., 1996, “Kinematics of a Three Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform for a Low-Cost Driving Simulator,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Advances in Robot Kinematics, pp. 89–98.
Carretero, J. A., Nahon, M., Gosselin, C. M., and Buckham, B., 1997, “Kinematic Analysis of a Three-DOF Parallel Mechanism for Telescope Applications,” Proceedings of the 1997 ASME Design Automation Conference, Sacramento, California, Paper No. DETC97/DAC-3981, 8 pp.
Wang,  S.-L., and Waldron,  K. J., 1987, “A Study of the Singular Configurations of Serial Manipulators,” ASME J. Mech., Transmissions, Automation Design, 109, No. 1, pp. 14–20.
Kieffer, J., and Lenarčič, J., 1992, “On the Exploitation of Mechanical Advantages Near Robot Singularities,” 3rd International Workshop on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Ferrara, Italy, pp. 65–72.
Pittens,  K. H., and Podhorodeski,  R. P., 1993, “A Family of Stewart Platforms With Optimal Dexterity,” J. Robotic Systems, 10, No. 4, pp. 463–479.
Gosselin,  C., and Angeles,  J., 1988, “The Optimum Kinematic Design of Planar Three-Degrees-Of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator,” ASME J. Mech., Transmissions, Automation Design, 110, No. 1, pp. 35–41.
Carretero, J. A., Nahon, M., and Podhorodeski, R. P., 1998, “Workspace Analysis of a Three DOF Parallel Mechanism,” Proceedings of the 1998 IROS Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 1021–1026.
Hunt, K. H., 1978, Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, UK.
Grace, A., 1992, Optimization Toolbox User’s Guide, The MathWorks, Inc.
Forsythe, G. E., Malcolm, M. A., and Moler, C. B., 1977, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.


Grahic Jump Location
Vector representation of one leg
Grahic Jump Location
Parasitic motion (a) along X axis, (b) along Y axis, and (c) around Z axis, at z=1/(√2),α=−β=120 deg, li=rp=1 (macro example)
Grahic Jump Location
Total translational parasitic motion (δ ) values for z=1/(√2),α=−β=120 deg, li=rp=1
Grahic Jump Location
T configuration: α=90 deg and β=−90 deg
Grahic Jump Location
Average of the x parasitic motion (xave) versus α and β (macro example)
Grahic Jump Location
Average of the total translational parasitic motion (δave) versus α and β (macro example)
Grahic Jump Location
Maximum of the total translational parasitic motion (δmm) versus α and β (macro example)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In